1. مینروا
  2. کتاب
  3. جامعه شناسی
  4. ایدئولوژی و آرمانشهر

ایدئولوژی و آرمانشهر

عنوان فارسی
ایدئولوژی و آرمانشهر
عنوان اصلی

Ideology And Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge

نویسنده:
Karl Mannheim

کارل مانهایم

نوع چاپ:
رقعی هاردکاور
تعداد صفحات:
352
انشتارات و سال چاپ:
·  Publisher: Martino Fine Books (February 5, 2015)
نویسندگان: کارل مانهایم
380,000تومان

موجود در انبار

null

تضمین کیفیت کالا

محصولات با کیفیت و استاندارد

null

ارسال رایگان

برای سفارش های بالای 500 هزارتومان

null

پشتیبانی آنلاین

ارسال پیام از طریق واتس اپ

null

ضمانت بازگشت وجه

7 روز ضمانت بازگشت وجه

2015 Reprint of Original 1936 American Edition. Exact facsimile of the original edition, not reproduced with Optical Recognition Software. Karl Mannheim was a Hungarian-born sociologist, influential in the first half of the 20th century and one of the founding fathers of classical sociology as well as a founder of the sociology of knowledge. His essays on the sociology of knowledge have become classics in the field. In “Ideology and Utopia” he argued that the application of the term ideology ought to be broadened. He traced the history of the term from what he called a “particular” view. This view originally saw ideology as the perhaps deliberate obscuring of facts. Over time this view gave way to a “total” conception (most notably in Marx), which argued that a whole social group’s thought was formed by its social position (e.g. the proletariat’s beliefs were conditioned by their relationship to the means of production). However, he called for a further step, which he called a general total conception of ideology, in which it was recognized that everyone’s beliefs-including the social scientist’s-were a product of the context they were created in. Mannheim points out social class, location and generation as the greatest determinants of knowledge. He feared this could lead to relativism but proposed the idea of relationism as an antidote. To uphold the distinction, he maintained that the recognition of different perspectives according to differences in time and social location appears arbitrary only to an abstract and disembodied theory of knowledge.

پیشنهاد های مشابه
فهرست